SSC 2006 London
Obstructive Sleep Apnea Case Study
Last modified 2006-05-19
Please check this page regularly for updates, corrections, and answers to frequently-asked questions!
Table of Contents
Acknowledgements
Thanks to Dr. Sharon Chung of the Department of Psychiatry at Toronto Western Hospital for providing this case study, and to her co-investigators Negar Ahmadi and Colin Shapiro.
Please address queries about the data to Alison Gibbs, Department of Statistics, University of Toronto.
Summary of Study
Background:
The Berlin Questionnaire for sleep apnea in a sleep clinic population: relationship to polysomnographic measurement of respiratory disturbance.
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is characterized by the cessation of breathing in sleep lasting more than ten seconds and resulting in total or partial arrest in respiration. If left untreated, sleep apnea has been shown to result in an elevated mortality rate. This is primarily due to the causal relationship between sleep apnea and coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction, stroke, systemic hypertension and pulmonary hypertension. The most serious socio-economic impact of untreated sleep apnea is the three to seven-fold greater prevalence of motor vehicle accidents in drivers with untreated sleep apnea. Further consequences of undiagnosed and untreated sleep apnea include a reduction in the quality of life, cognitive dysfunction, decreased vigilance, disturbed concentration and memory, increased mental stress, depression, fatigue, anxiety, nocturnal panic attacks, general mood disorders and male sexual dysfunction.
The estimated prevalence of OSA varies with respect to gender and age. In middle-aged adults, clinically significant sleep apnea (Respiratory Disturbance Index (RDI) > 10) affects approximately 2-5% of males and 2% of females. It has been estimated that about 24% of primary care patients have OSA. About one out of 3 patients referred to the sleep specialists at the Toronto Western Hospital are suspected of having sleep apnea.
Overnight polysomnography with recording of respiratory disturbance is the gold standard for the diagnosis of sleep apnea. In the past, it had been preferable to administer two nights of polysomnographic testing. The reason for this is the first night effect wherein the first night of sleep in a laboratory (or any other strange environment) is characterized by a reduction in the quantity and quality of sleep. Further, there has been shown to be a night-to-night variability in respiratory disturbance index, the respiratory variable used to measure the presence and severity of OSA. Based on one night only of laboratory sleep study, it has been reported that between 11-22% of sleep apnea patients remain undiagnosed. Home-based sleep studies, where one would assume that the first night effect would not be a factor, have reported similar instances of missed diagnosis of OSA based on only one night of recordings.
However, recently the healthcare system has mandated that having two nights of diagnostic sleep studies should be discontinued in favour of a single night. Considering that an additional night is required for determining the appropriate adjustments for patients requiring treatment, there is a greater pressure on sleep specialists to make their diagnoses based on only a single night of recording. Given the greater chance of a missed diagnosis based on only one night of recording, the clinical interview will now play a greater role in identifying patients with sleep apnea. As an aid to the clinical interview process, all clinic patients are asked in advance to complete a battery of questionnaires that is reviewed by their sleep specialist at the time of the medical consultation. The questionnaire consists of a number of scales and instruments that screen for a variety of sleep disorders.
One of the instruments in the clinic questionnaire battery is the Berlin Questionnaire (BQ), a scale for sleep apnea. This 10-item scale assesses the risk (high or low) of having sleep apnea based on the responses to the questions. The questionnaire takes about 5 minutes to complete and for patients with clinically significant sleep apnea the positive predictive value is 0.97, the specificity 0.97 and the sensitivity 0.54. Given the reduction in the number of nights of sleep studies, the Berlin Questionnaire has the potential of playing a greater role in deciding whether or not a patient is at high risk of having OSA. However, only a couple of studies in the literature have compared the scores on the Berlin scale to the respiratory disturbance index (or apnea-hypopnea index), the gold standard for sleep apnea diagnosis. Further, none of these studies used a sleep clinic population where the presence of other sleep disorders may alter the sensitivity and specificity of the Berlin Questionnaire for sleep apnea.
Patients with sleep apnea generally present with excessive daytime sleepiness and, women, in particular, seem to complain more of insomnia or fatigue. Clinically, the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (a widely used measure of excessive daytime sleepiness) can be a useful additional tool to help identify those who might be suspected of having sleep apnea. Given the gender differences, the Fatigue Severity Scale (an instrument that has been used to measure fatigue in a number of patient populations) and the Athens Insomnia Scale (an instrument developed to screen for insomnia) would be especially useful to help identify women who may be missed by the usual criteria. No studies in the literature have looked at whether the predictive power of the Berlin Questionnaire in correctly identifying those with sleep apnea can be improved if augmented by information from the Epworth Sleepiness Scale, the Athens Insomnia Scale and the Fatigue Severity Scale.
A screening tool for sleep apnea has significance beyond sleep medicine. In a similar manner as occurs during sleep, reduction or cessation of airflow can occur in sleep apnea patients with central nervous system depression resulting from administration of sedatives or anesthetic agents. However, unlike normal sleep, the defense mechanisms (such as arousal) that help to overcome hypoxia are suppressed during anesthesia. Accordingly, life-threatening respiratory complications have been reported in the peri-surgical and post-surgical period in patients with unrecognized severe sleep apnea. In the anesthetic setting, screening for sleep apnea using the Berlin Questionnaire would be of immense value to help prevent peri- and post-surgical complications. At present, anesthesia researchers at the Toronto Western Hospital are interested in developing an abbreviated form of the Berlin Questionnaire as a quick screening tool for all surgical patients. Information on which items of the Berlin Questionnaire are more predictive of a greater risk of sleep apnea would be desirable for these purposes.
All the aforementioned issues must be explored before the Berlin Questionnaire scale can be relied upon to identify those at high risk for having sleep apnea, not only in the sleep clinic, but in other clinical settings. The aim of this study is to compare the findings on the Berlin Questionnaire to that of overnight polysomnography in patients who have had two nights of sleep studies.
As the healthcare system has indicated that only a single night of diagnostic sleep studies is preferred, it is necessary to investigate whether the Berlin Questionnaire is more predictive of sleep apnea based on the first, second or both nights of sleep apnea screening. A goal of this study is to take into account whether subjective measures of sleepiness, insomnia and fatigue are a useful adjunct in improving the predictive power of the Berlin Questionnaire. An additional goal is to establish the feasibility of abbreviating the Berlin Questionnaire by determining if certain specific items on the scale are more predictive of sleep apnea with a higher sensitivity and specificity. Lastly, as it has been suggested that the presentation of sleep apnea is different in men and women, gender differences in the sensitivity and specificity of the Berlin Questionnaire need to be explored.
Objectives:
The objectives of this study are as follows:
- To determine the sensitivity and specificity of the Berlin Questionnaire compared to findings of respiratory disturbance based on one versus two nights of polysomnographic recording in a sleep clinic population.
- To ascertain which items of the Berlin Questionnaire are more predictive of sleep apnea towards developing an abbreviated version of the questionnaire.
- To explore if gender differences alter the specificity and sensitivity of the Berlin Questionnaire.
- To determine if a questionnaire battery comprised of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale and the Fatigue Severity Scale in addition to the Berlin Questionnaire improves the sensitivity and specificity of correctly identifying patients with sleep apnea.
Hypotheses:
Primary: Overall, the Berlin Questionnaire will detect sleep apnea in a sleep clinic patient population with a high sensitivity and specificity. The second night of the diagnostic study will demonstrate a stronger correlation to findings on the questionnaire.
Secondary: A shorter version of the Berlin Questionnaire can be developed to include only those items that are more predictive of sleep apnea.
Tertiary: The Berlin Questionnaire will have reduced sensitivity and specificity in women. Use of the Athens Insomnia Scale and the Fatigue Severity Scale, but not the Epworth Sleepiness Scale, will improve the predictive power of the Berlin Questionnaire in women.
Study design:
This is a retrospective, chart review study of sleep clinic patients who have completed the Berlin Questionnaire for sleep apnea in addition to undergoing two overnight sleep study. All clinic charts from patients who had 2 overnight sleep studies as well as having completed the Berlin Questionnaire in a one year period were included.
Description of the data set:
Data are available for 133 subjects. A description of all variables is here.
Frequently Asked Questions
Please check this section regularly for updates. (Updated May 19, 2006.)